Judge: Google 'Street View' Case Dismissal Denied

By James Lee Phillips

July 2, 2011 12:20 PM EDT

Google's Street View lawsuits will proceed, according to a federal judge on Wednesday. The company's request for dismissal was denied without prejudice, so Google may resubmit the request should it compose a stronger argument.

Judge James Ware, chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, agreed to dismiss the state-level claims, while allowing the federal-level wiretapping case to go forward.

The case stems from Google's massive and controversial Street View project, which at its core assembled a panoramic photographic map of many metropolitan and rural areas across the globe. However, many had no idea at the time that Google's Street View vehicles were also collecting wi-fi data -- including Google itself, according to the company's official statements.

"In 2006 an engineer working on an experimental WiFi project wrote a piece of code that sampled all categories of publicly broadcast WiFi data," Google's Senior VP, Engineering & Research Alan Eustace wrote. "A year later, when our mobile team started a project to collect basic WiFi network data like SSID information and MAC addresses using Google’s Street View cars, they included that code in their software—although the project leaders did not want, and had no intention of using, payload data."

Google is facing numerous lawsuits from this affair, but succeeded in getting the numerous US class-action suits combined into one case. The Mountain View-based company may have had hopes that a single case and a home-court advantage might shorten the exposure and lessen the potential damage, and attempted to make the argument that the data was 'readily accessible' -- that everything that it had done, any reasonably capable person could do from public property.

Follow us

However, Judge Ware determined that there was sufficient cause to entertain arguments that 'sniffing packets' could be construed as wiretapping -- and that Google was trying to 'have their cake and eat it too':

"While Plaintiffs plead that their networks, or electronic communications systems, were configured such that the general public may join the network and readily transmit electronic communications across that network to the Internet," Ware stated, "Plaintiffs [also] plead that the networks were themselves configured to render the data packets, or electronic communications, unreadable and inaccessible without the use of rare packet sniffing software; technology allegedly outside the purview of the general public."

James Lee Phillips is a Senior Writer & Research Analyst for IBG.com. With offices in Dallas, Las Vegas, and New York, & London, IBG is quickly becoming the leading expert in Internet Marketing, Local Search, SEO, Website Development and Reputation Management. More information can be found at www.ibg.com. Krittibas Ray explains asset management! Asset managers study the markets and the companies from which particular stocks and bonds are issued and decide which are best for their clients!

This article is contributed by IBG.com and does not represent the views or opinions of International Business Times.
Sponsor Link:
Join the Conversation
IBTimes TV

Women Vote For The First Time In Egypt

World
Canada Commits 300 Million to Afghanistan, But No Troops