Education

Foreign exchange markets are dependent on national central banks as well as the inflation, the interest rates, as well as the money support are under control of the latter. Sometimes there are some certain goals for the national central banks concerning their national currencies target exchange rates. As well as they possess their own substantial foreign exchange reserves, they can use these reserves for the purpose of economy stabilization. The stabilization strategy for the central banks offered by Milton Friedman is trading for profit which means buy as soon as the exchange rate gets too low and to sell in order it is too high. Though while the central banks do not have any risk of the bankruptcy in case of large losses, there is no reason for them to follow this strategy.

It is enough for the central banks to provide some rumor or expectations in order to make the currency stable but to the countries with an unstable currency policy it is possible to apply such methods as an aggressive intervention. Still, it doesn't always let the central banks achieve their goals. Any central bank can be easily defeated by the combination of market resources. The 1992-93 ERM collapse has suffered various kinds of these operations as well as the South East Asia later.

Currency stock exchanges are the reality for the transitive economies. Legal person currency exchange and Forex exchange rate shaping are realized by the currency stock exchanges. Forex exchange rate is usually widely affected by the state due to the market density.

Forex broker firms - they provide the currency conversion or credit-depositary processes between the foreign currency purchaser and seller as well as the meeting of the above mentioned ones. The broker firms have their fee by charging the percent out of the operation sum.

The share of the retail brokers is insignificant in accordance with the general amount of foreign exchange market. A daily retail volume estimated by one broker is from $25 to $50 billion according to CNN-provided data which makes only about 2% of the whole volume. According to the National Futures Association official cited by CNN as well, "Retail forex trading has increased dramatically over the past few years. Unfortunately, the amount of forex fraud has also increased dramatically." The retail forex makers generally work with two different trading desks. The first one called "non-dealing" desk is used for the actual foreign exchange trading and is generally traded by the proprietary. The second one called "dealing desk" or "trading desk" is used for traiding off-exchange with retail customers. As far as a great number of retail speculators of the currency are beginners and are hardly profit-making the "offset" of the clients' trades on the interbank market is impossible as it's asked by the makers that have to take the same position with the clients. The interbank market would have a stable income from the market makers in case all trades were offset. In case the market maker considers the net positions of its clients to be quite insecure it usually applies offsetting.

The dealing desk has roughly the same functions as currency exchange counter does in the bank. The retail customer sees the interbank exchange rates at a dealing desk (in the bank lobby as well) only after the rates coming from the interbank system are adjusted at a non-dealing desk in order to preserve the market makers' (or the banks') profit. That's why the prices of dealing desks can't be considered as a direct currency exchange index being the value substituted by the originating broker.

The off-market pricing done by retail market makers on the retail trading platforms gives sense to the arbitrage which is still effectively avoided by makers by moving the pickers (which is a widely used name for arbitrages) off from their systems as well as by a sharp reduction of market activity of the latter.

Most Forex brokers, excluding rather small number of them, do not provide a direct access to the interbank trading for their customers due to two obvious reasons. First reason is a limited number of banks which are ready to deal with private investors' orders and the inability for the brokers to offer this service as a result. The second is that as far as the traders' losses transform directly into the market makers' profit while using the dealing desk model, it is very profitable for such firms as Gain Capital, SaxoBank, FXCM, GFT, and FX Solutions to follow it.

Dealing desk brokers can not only be in charge of the trading but the pricing as well and they can adjust it in any way and any moment to raise the income while non-dealing desk brokers earnings come only out of transaction commissions (fees). To prove this some traders try to make a requotation of a counteroffer done by a market maker by satisfying the execution order of the trader that rejects the order based on the defined terms instead of accepting the offer and places another one that is thought to meet the interests of the market maker.

It is worth mentioning that the retail speculators are not actually in beneficial conditions due to the "rules of the game". Possible large profits are the bait for the inexperienced and moreover low-capitalized (because of the account minimum of 250-500 USD) speculators. What is more, some traders are compelled to take unreasonably large positions because of low position size varying from 10,000 to 100,000 units on major platforms. Very high leverage at the amount of 1:100 or even 1:200 is considered to be the worst thing about retail Forex firms. The average leverage used by professional traders generally doesn't exceed 1:10 whether retail Forex firm use such a high leverage without any notification. Such account defaulting may lead to a margin call that would be profitable for the market maker in order the trade is not offset.

Dealing desk brokers being market makers besides creating made-up, off-exchange pricing, also correspond liquidity sources, completely independent and competing, for the banks that take part in the trading by acing as interbank system market makers. Brokers are defenseless before possible off-exchange trade taking out that is thought as a ground for interests conflict.