Log in to your IBTimes Account

close
ID
Password
  • Set your IBTimes.com Edition

Key investor in Montana coal-fired power plant backs out



By SUSAN GALLAGHER, AP
29 April 2008 @ 12:10 pm ET

HELENA, Mont. - A key investor in a planned coal-fired power plant near Great Falls has backed out of the project, citing financial and environmental uncertainties.

Related Topic

Get stories by e-mail on this topic.

E-mail:

Meanwhile, the executive overseeing the development of the Highwood Generating Station said Monday that he remains optimistic the plant will be sufficiently financed.

Earlier this month, the Yellowstone Valley Electric Cooperative asked to withdraw from the project after investing several million dollars. The request was granted by the board of the Southern Montana Electric Generating & Transmission Cooperative, the coalition planning the 250-megawatt plant east of Great Falls.

Yellowstone Valley had questions about Highwood's prospects for adequate financing and was concerned about the steep cost of compliance with shifting environmental regulations for coal-fired plants, amid growing concern the fuel contributes to climate change, according to Terry Holzer, general manager of the co-op based in Huntley.

"We don't feel it's a viable project any longer," Holzer said. "Many utilities across the country have pulled the plug on coal-fired power plants."

As the largest partner, Yellowstone Valley had invested $4.3 million of a $10 million line of credit and had another several million in Highwood equity, Holzer said.

Five cooperatives and the city of Great Falls launched Southern Montana Electric several years ago and pursued development of the estimated $790 million plant, which has faced a series of environmental hurdles. In the latest, a state board decided last week that Montana regulators and plant developers must examine more ways to control air emissions.

Although Yellowstone Valley was the largest backer, its departure does not kill the project, said Tim Gregori, chief executive officer for Southern Montana Electric. Gregori said there are prospective replacement partners, but declined to name them.

Gregori said Yellowstone Valley's "comfort for the level of risk and the progress being made has reached the point that they asked to be relieved" of partnership in the plant, and the board honored that request.

If the plant is built, Yellowstone Valley could be reimbursed for its investment, Gregori said. If the plant fails, then the investment would be lost, Gregori said.

Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Click!
  • Rate this article:

Comments

Post Your Comment

*Name


advertisement
More Politics & Policy
Software, biotech firms and others who develop new ways to do business will be watching closely on Monday as the U.S. Supreme Court hears a case that cou...
U.S. President Barack Obama urged Americans on Friday not to jump to conclusions on the motive behind the mass shooting at the sprawling Fort Hood army b...
The Obama administration would be willing to hold bilateral talks with North Korea but only if certain conditions were met, the president's top adviser o...

advertisement
Advertisement
POS Magnetic Card Readers

Online distributor for point of sale equipment, TYSSO and Pegasus.

 
IBTimes.com Web
Partners
International Business Times© 2009 The Ibtimes Company. All Rights Reserved. Terms of service | Privacy Policy | Advertising | About Us | Contact Us | Archives