Log in to your IBTimes Account

close
ID
Password

Key investor in Montana coal-fired power plant backs out



By SUSAN GALLAGHER
29 April 2008 @ 12:10 pm EST

HELENA, Mont. (AP) - A key investor in a planned coal-fired power plant near Great Falls has backed out of the project, citing financial and environmental uncertainties.

Related Topic

Get stories by e-mail on this topic.

E-mail:

Meanwhile, the executive overseeing the development of the Highwood Generating Station said Monday that he remains optimistic the plant will be sufficiently financed.

Earlier this month, the Yellowstone Valley Electric Cooperative asked to withdraw from the project after investing several million dollars. The request was granted by the board of the Southern Montana Electric Generating & Transmission Cooperative, the coalition planning the 250-megawatt plant east of Great Falls.

Yellowstone Valley had questions about Highwood's prospects for adequate financing and was concerned about the steep cost of compliance with shifting environmental regulations for coal-fired plants, amid growing concern the fuel contributes to climate change, according to Terry Holzer, general manager of the co-op based in Huntley.

"We don't feel it's a viable project any longer," Holzer said. "Many utilities across the country have pulled the plug on coal-fired power plants."

As the largest partner, Yellowstone Valley had invested $4.3 million of a $10 million line of credit and had another several million in Highwood equity, Holzer said.

Five cooperatives and the city of Great Falls launched Southern Montana Electric several years ago and pursued development of the estimated $790 million plant, which has faced a series of environmental hurdles. In the latest, a state board decided last week that Montana regulators and plant developers must examine more ways to control air emissions.

Although Yellowstone Valley was the largest backer, its departure does not kill the project, said Tim Gregori, chief executive officer for Southern Montana Electric. Gregori said there are prospective replacement partners, but declined to name them.

Gregori said Yellowstone Valley's "comfort for the level of risk and the progress being made has reached the point that they asked to be relieved" of partnership in the plant, and the board honored that request.

If the plant is built, Yellowstone Valley could be reimbursed for its investment, Gregori said. If the plant fails, then the investment would be lost, Gregori said.

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Click!
  • Rate this article:

Comments

Post Your Comment

You must be an IBTimes member to post a comment. Login | Register


advertisement
More Politics & Policy
As of Sunday, July 6, 2008, at least 4,114 members of the U.S. military have died in the Iraq war since it began in March 2003, according to an Associate...
Freed after years as rebel-held hostages, French-Colombian politician Ingrid Betancourt and four Colombian police officers sent messages of hope in a rad...
The "Norfolk 17" were honored Sunday at the church that educated them 50 years ago when six of the city's all-white public schools closed under Virginia'...

Advertisement
Latest Investing Research Reports

Find the most up to date research from leading investment firms to make the most informed investing decisions

Corporate Website Design

Professional Website Design For Corporate - Get a Free Quote Today

advertisement
 
IBTimes.com Web
Partners
International Business Times© 2008 The Ibtimes Company. All Rights Reserved. Terms of service | Privacy Policy | Advertising | About Us | Contact Us | Archives