Log in to your IBTimes Account

close
ID
Password
  • Set your IBTimes.com Edition

Merck & Co. wins Appeals on Vioxx cases in Texas and New Jersey



By Rebecca Cruz
30 May 2008 @ 01:29 am ET

Merck & Co. won two cases related to its painkiller Vioxx on Thursday after two appeals courts in Texas and New Jersey, reversed verdicts against the company for damages and death in patients who took the drug.

Quotes
MRK 35.62 0.48

Shares of Merck closed at $38.92 or 26 cents up and rose 18 cents more in after hour's electronic trade to $39.10 in the New York Stock Exchange on Thursday.

"Today's decisions overturn almost $40 million of damages and attorneys fees previously awarded to plaintiffs at trial," said Bruce Kuhlik Merck's general counsel.

In Texas, a jury awarded plaintiff Carol Ernst $253.4 million after finding Merck's Vioxx responsible for the dead of her husband. However the court reduced it later to $26 million under state damages caps.

The case in Texas started in 2005 and was the first Vioxx lawsuit that went to trial. Today, the Texas Appeals Court overturned the veredict and ruled that there was "no competent evidence that a blood clot triggered by Vioxx ingestion" caused the death of Mr. Ernst .

Kuhlik said in a statement the company was gratified that the Texas appeals court correctly reversed the previous decision.

Separately, Superior Court of New Jersey's Apellate Division voided two Vioxx cases treated at the same time in Atlantic City in 2006.

One is the case of John and Irma McDarby who were awarded by a jury by $4.5 million in compensatory damages and $9 million in punitive for use of the painkiller Vioxx totaling $13.5 million. But the court today annulled the punitive award and part of the compensatory damages that was based on New Jersey's consumer fraud statute.

The other case involved plaintiff Thomas Cona but the court upheld a verdict in favor of Merck.

"We intend to seek further review of the portion of the award that remains standing after the New Jersey decision. We continue to believe Merck acted responsibly." Kuhlik said.

Drug manufacturer Merck pulled out Vioxx in September 2004 after the company founded the drug doubled risks of heart attacks and also strokes.

In November the company announced it settled thousands of customers' claims linked to Vioxx with $4.86 billion. The drug was taken for about 20 million patients in the United States before it was withdrawn from the market.

This article is copyrighted by International Business Times.

    Click!
  • Rate this article:

Comments

Post Your Comment

*Name


advertisement
More Industries
Royal Dutch Shell is in talks to buy 10 percent of India's Essar Oil as part of a deal where it would sell three European refineries to the Indian firm, ...
Japan's Honda Motor Co Ltd has again produced the most fuel efficient and least polluting vehicles on American roads, the U.S. government projections for...
A Chinese engineer arrested on suspicion of stealing Ford Motor Co. trade secrets will likely face additional charges after more secret data was found on...

advertisement
Advertisement
POS Magnetic Card Readers

Online distributor for point of sale equipment, TYSSO and Pegasus.

 
IBTimes.com Web
Partners
International Business Times© 2009 The Ibtimes Company. All Rights Reserved. Terms of service | Privacy Policy | Advertising | About Us | Contact Us | Archives