Log in to your IBTimes Account

close
ID
Password

Supreme Court rulings won't end lawsuits



By DEBORAH HASTINGS, AP
28 June 2008 @ 04:18 pm EST

For at least a decade, the Supreme Court has declined to rule on the use of lethal injections and whether the death penalty applies to anyone who rapes a child. In its term ending Friday, the high court issued decisions on both, but neither solves the bitter fight over capital punishment.


Death Penalty
In this November 2005, file photo, the combination of lethal injection drugs is posted on the wall in the equipment room next to the death chamber at Southern Ohio Corrections Facility in Lucasville, Ohio. A judge in Ohio said on June 10, 2008 that the state's method of putting prisoners to death is unconstitutional because two of three drugs used in lethal injection can cause pain. (AP Photo/Kiichiro Sato, File)
1 of 1

Related Topic

Get stories by e-mail on this topic.

E-mail:

Death penalty opponents have instead promised even more litigation claiming lethal injection can cause excruciating pain.

In disparate decisions, the court ruled in April that fatal injection, when done properly, does not violate Eighth Amendment protections against cruel and unusual punishment. On Wednesday, justices declared killing child rapists does violate it.

And it is the earlier decision, some legal experts say, that will most affect death penalty challenges. Not for what it clarifies, but for what it doesn't.

This spring's ruling was based on one Kentucky execution that encountered no problems while officials administered a three-drug injection. Defense attorneys argued the use of that protocol risked causing cruel levels of pain.

But the court established that challengers must prove "substantial risk of serious harm." Sparse evidence presented by defense attorneys in the Kentucky case did not meet that requirement, justices said.

Yet, say several death penalty experts, that new standard establishes a threshold while simultaneously opening a door to cross it.

Defense attorneys who can document that botched executions have caused serious suffering could gain great inroads for their death row clients, those experts said.

"This presents not just an opportunity, but an obligation to develop arguments with evidence about less-than-perfect protocols," said Douglas Berman, a law professor and death penalty expert at Ohio State University's Moritz College of Law. "And those states inclined to tweak their protocols may be setting themselves up for further litigation by people who will say 'Hey, they changed their protocols so that must mean there's something wrong with them.'"

Such challenges have already occurred in California, which has the nation's highest death row population at 669, and Texas, which executes more inmates than any other state.

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Click!
  • Rate this article:

Comments

Post Your Comment

You must be an IBTimes member to post a comment. Login | Register


advertisement
More Politics & Policy
Two American diplomatic outposts in Pakistan received envelopes containing an unknown white powder last week, sparking a security scare, a U.S. Embassy s...
Powerful Hurricane Ike rolled down an uncertain path Sunday that may lead to the U.S. Gulf Coast late this week, forcing emergency officials to pay atten...
The Turks and Caicos premier says Hurricane Ike has damaged 80 percent of the homes on Grand Turk island. Michael Misick tells The Associated Press by ph...

Advertisement
Corporate Website Design

Professional Website Design For Corporate - Get a Free Quote Today

advertisement
 
IBTimes.com Web
Partners
International Business Times© 2008 The Ibtimes Company. All Rights Reserved. Terms of service | Privacy Policy | Advertising | About Us | Contact Us | Archives