Log in to your IBTimes Account

close
ID
Password

Calif. to seek fines against Blue Cross, Shield



By SHAYA TAYEFE MOHAJER, AP
07 July 2008 @ 10:22 pm EST

LOS ANGELES - California health insurance regulators are scrutinizing 1,770 patient policies canceled by Anthem Blue Cross to see if they can impose a penalty stiffer than a $1 million fine they announced last year but never enforced.

Related Topic

Get stories by e-mail on this topic.

E-mail:

Each case of an improperly canceled policy carries the possibility of a $200,000 maximum fine against the state's largest insurer. The potential $354 million total would dwarf the now-abandoned 2007 fine.

"The terrible practice of rescissions has caused irreparable harm to consumers by making some individuals responsible for large medical bills and hindering their ability to get and keep health coverage," said Cindy Ehnes, head of the Department of Managed Health Care. "Our goal is to fight for the consumer in each and every case and to use all enforcement authority available under state law."

Ehnes said Monday that the state's regulatory agency will also re-evaluate about 400 Blue Shield of California rescissions. At issue is whether the insurers systematically canceled patients' policies when they became pregnant or chronically ill or made large claims.

The renewed enforcement effort comes after The Associated Press reported last week that the state didn't pursue the announced fine against Anthem Blue Cross because it was intimidated by the insurer's legal resources.

After announcing the million-dollar fine against Anthem Blue Cross in March 2007, regulators instead tried reach a negotiated settlement to reinstate health insurance policies but failed.

"We can bring the full force of fines, penalties and all enforcement powers of the state to protect the patients that (insurers) refused to voluntarily do right by," said Daniel Zingale, an adviser to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and former head of the regulatory agency.

In separate but similar statements Monday, Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of California both called for independent third parties to take a hand in deciding rescission cases.

Anthem Blue Cross noted that during negotiations with the regulator, they previously offered "at (the insurer's) expense, expedited independent third-party reviews."

But such reviews too frequently side with insurers, said Jerry Flanagan, health advocate for Consumer Watchdog, a Santa Monica-based consumer advocacy group.

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Click!
  • Rate this article:

Comments

Post Your Comment

You must be an IBTimes member to post a comment. Login | Register


advertisement
More Industries
Shares of Beacon Roofing Supply Inc. rose Wednesday, a day after reporting unexpectedly strong fourth-quarter results. An analyst boosted his earnings es...
Among the earnings projection stories for Wednesday, Dec. 3, from AP Financial News: SAN FRANCISCO (AP)--Del Monte Foods Co., which distributes food and ...
Moody's Investors Service lowered Republic Services Inc.'s senior unsecured rating Wednesday but kept it at the investment grade level, citing the compan...

Advertisement
Reach emerging Latin American markets!

Baldwin Linguas:
Translations Interpreting Localization:
English French Portuguese Spanish

Build Business Credit for your company with NO PERSONAL GUARANTEES!

Building your business and corporate credit for your small business.

Los angeles web design

Get your next web design project done with our los angeles web design team - Best web design with great price.

advertisement
 
IBTimes.com Web
Partners
International Business Times© 2008 The Ibtimes Company. All Rights Reserved. Terms of service | Privacy Policy | Advertising | About Us | Contact Us | Archives