Log in to your IBTimes Account

close
ID
Password
  • Set your IBTimes.com Edition

Largest independent oil refiner hopes for cap-and-trade defeat in Senate



By Julieta Mendoza
28 July 2009 @ 04:17 pm ET

Valero Energy Corp. chief executive officer Bill Klesse hopes the Waxman-Markey bill, which includes a proposal to enact a cap-and-trade system in the country, is eventually defeated when it gets into the U.S. Senate, he said Tuesday.

The executive, who leads the largest independent oil refinery in the country, said the bill would impose a "hidden tax" in the form of a cap-and-trade system. Klesse said the bill is a "huge negative" for consumers and the country, as refiners would be charged for the carbon dioxide emissions they generate and consequently pass the costs to consumers.

"Every single fuel that is produced will go up on price (under cap-and-trade)," Klesse said today during a conference call with investors. "We (Valero) are going to be very active on participation on how much this means to the consumer, to this industry and to the American Economy.”

Klesse's comments came today the company reported a loss of $254 million or 48 cents per share and revenue of $17.9 billion in the second quarter, compared with revenue of $36.6 billion a year ago. The company cited lower diesel and jet fuel margins and lower sour crude oil differentials.

Valero is backing critics of the proposed legislation who cite the Congressional Budget Office which projects an increase of 77 cents per gallon of gasoline if the cap-and-trade legislation passes. This means an additional $800 per year for gasoline considering each family consumes 20 gallons per week, according to the CBO.

Klesse also based his comments on analysis from the Heritage Foundation which found the bill would cause a loss of $393 billion of the U.S.' real gross domestic product hitting a high of $662 billion in 2035 and resulting in a total loss of $9.4 trillion by 2035.

The foundation’s analysis projects that by 2035 there will be 2.5 million jobs lost due to the cap-and-trade bill.

For a household of four, it would cost about $2,979 per year and increase to $4,600 in 2035 including power, food, supplies, gasoline and transportation expenses, the foundation states. In contrast, the Environmental Protection Agency says the bill would cost households $140 a year and predicts electric bills will be 7 percent lower in 2020 because of the legislation.

The Waxman-Markey bill was passed narrowly by the House of Representatives in June. It was being promoted as a bill aimed to cut greenhouse gas emissions linked to global warming, including carbon dioxide.

Under the bill, companies will be given permits to pollute and would be able to sell and buy additional permits in a market.

This article is copyrighted by International Business Times.

    Click!
  • Rate this article:

Comments
1.
Jul 28, 2009 10:10pm

Please encourage your law makers to vote against this bill. This will destroy small communities like the one where I live and raise our cost of living. "Change" should not include destroying people's lives, livelihoods or entire communities!
2.
Jul 28, 2009 11:31pm

I have been working environmental improvement for 3 decades, (up till recently). The public has been sold a bill of goods on this one. They have been taught in the government schools and impressed by the press that anything "green" is good. So the politicians eager for votes and trying hard to avoid the light of day support this bill so they don't stand out against the paradigm. Well this legislation is good for the tree frog (maybe) but will make the unemployment lines longer and will creep up the cost slowly so you don't remember who to blame. Any cost that industry bears has to be passed on to consumers or they shut down so guess who pays? You and I of course. My suggestion is, if this passes the Senate we should all invest in bicycles, learn to plant a garden and move South. (Unemployed Pulp and Paper Industry ex employee). Oh and vote the Senators a new job next election day.
3.
Jul 28, 2009 11:34pm

Time is ticking . We vote out the house & sentors , vote all new reps who suport the people !
4.
Jul 29, 2009 8:47am

While I believe that we must do something to stem the tide of climate change soon, I do not beleive that Waxman-Markey and/or cap and trade is the best way to do it. In fact, I think Waxman-Markey is practically meaningless with all of the concessions that have been given away to ensure passage. Having said that, there is an alternative: a straightforward and transparent revenue-neutral carbon tax that will avoid the evasion and market manipulation inherent to cap and trade, incentivize green R&D and recycle the revenue to families already struggling under the weight of the current economic downturn. A carbon tax protects the environment, American families AND the overall economy. I hope that Mr. Klesse takes a look at this alternative and throws his weighty support behind it.

Post Your Comment

*Name


advertisement
More Energy
U.S.-listed solar shares sank on Monday, cutting into gains earlier this month as investors feared Germany's new coalition government could trim support ...
Exelon Corp, the largest nuclear power operator in the United States, on Monday became the latest U.S. power company to say it will leave the Chamber of ...

advertisement
 
IBTimes.com Web
Partners
International Business Times© 2010 The Ibtimes Company. All Rights Reserved. Terms of service | Privacy Policy | Advertising | About Us | Contact Us | Archives