Herman Cain's 999 Plan: Will It Work? Experts Speak Out

Analysis

By Maggie Astor: Subscribe to Maggie's

October 13, 2011 12:00 PM EDT

Herman Cain has been making waves with his catchy "9-9-9" tax plan -- but is it good economic policy? The International Business Times spoke with experts at several economic think tanks to find out.

Share This Story

A Simple but Controversial Plan

The basic structure of the plan is simple. It would involve three separate taxes: a nine percent personal income tax, a nine percent corporate tax and a nine percent national sales tax. Eventually, if Cain has his way, he would replace all of that with a single "consumption tax," which would tax purchases rather than income. The national sales tax included in the 9-9-9 plan is meant as a step in that direction.

The 9-9-9 plan stole the show at the Republican presidential candidates' debate at Dartmouth College on Tuesday, but it has been widely panned both by Democrats and by Cain's Republican opponents.

Democrats call the plan unfair for reducing taxes on the wealthy while increasing them for many low-income Americans. Republicans have made a litany of criticisms: Future presidents could increase three tax streams rather than one. It oversimplifies the complex problem of improving the tax code. Or, more pragmatically, it could never pass Congress anyway, so what's the point?

Follow us

Side I: Good Economic Policy

Support for the 9-9-9 plan focuses less on how it will affect the distribution of wealth, and more on how it will affect the economy as a whole. On a macroeconomic scale, Cain argues, the plan has tremendous potential to strengthen the economy and create jobs, because it would lower taxes on businesses, giving them an incentive to start hiring.

Daniel Mitchell, a senior fellow with the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank, said the principles of Cain's plan were solid. "As a matter of economic policy, it's a very good idea: lower marginal tax rates, less double taxation on savings and investments, and elimination of corrupt and inefficient loopholes," he told IBTimes. "Those are all things that public finance economists have long recognized are important."

The 9-9-9 plan has drawbacks "relative to an ideal tax system," but "relative to our current system, you'd have to say on balance it's much better," Will McBride, an economist for The Tax Foundation, a nonpartisan tax research group based in Washington, said. "It reduces taxes on saving and investment, and that's where economic growth comes from, basically. That is its primary benefit, and then, of course, it simplifies the tax code tremendously."

Supporters of the plan have addressed some of the main criticisms of it, such as the fear -- raised most recently by Michele Bachmann at Tuesday's debate -- that future presidents would inevitably raise the nine percent rate, creating, for example, a 15-15-15 plan.

"It's certainly a risk, but that's the history of taxation," McBride said. "Sure, there's always going to be that pressure with any tax, but we have to compare to the current system, and it's a big improvement over the current system. It's a big reduction in the top tax rate and a flat tax on personal and corporate income. Those are very good things for long-term growth. Even if we eventually push the rate up to 15 percent, that's a drastic decrease from the current system," in which the corporate tax -- though not personal income tax -- is 35 percent.

And, in response to Mitt Romney's jab at Tuesday's debate that the 9-9-9 plan oversimplified the complex task of fixing the economy, Mitchell said, "I think the plan is strong because of its simplicity." There is more to fixing the economy than tax reform, of course, but "one of the reasons I think Cain is attracting so much support is because he's willing to come up with a bold plan," he said.

Kevin Hassett, the director of economic policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank, agreed. "This is a far more sophisticated plan than one might have expected, given that he is not a person that has been inside politics his whole life," Hassett told USA Today. "The Cain plan is really solid. The only criticism one could make is it's too bold or something like that."

Side II: Bad Economic Policy

This article is copyrighted by International Business Times, the business news leader
Sponsor Link:
Join the Conversation
IBTimes TV

73 yr Old Becomes Oldest Woman to Climb Mount Everest

Global Markets
Existing Home Sales Jump, World Banks Lowers China Forecast, Euro Prepares for Greek Exit