Apple Inc. (AAPL) recently touched and surpassed the $300 per share price level for the first time ever, placing it firmly in the sphere of high-priced stocks.
It joins such luminaries as Google (NASDAQ: GOOG), which currently trades at over $540 per share; Intuitive Surgical (Nasdaq: ISRG), $275; CME Group Inc. (NYSE: CME), $265; Mastercard (NYSE: MA), $233; Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS), $152; priceline.com Inc. (Nasdaq: PCLN), $350; BlackRock (NYSE: BLK), $178, among several others.
Of course, the titan is the class A share of Berkshire-Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.A), which trades in excess of $120,000 per share.
Given the massive, unrelenting success the company has enjoyed, Apple shares may soar even higher, of course, but it's important at this juncture to point out that high-priced stocks behave somewhat differently from their lower-priced peers on the exchanges.
For one thing, it is nearly impossible for the average retail shareholder to directly own a meaningful number of shares in these companies. (Through such vehicles as mutual funds and exchange-traded funds, the average retail stockpicker can gain some access to these companies, but still a very minimal stake nonetheless).
Follow us
Indeed, about 80 percent of Google's shares outstanding is owned by institutions, while the figure for Apple is about 70 percent. (In contrast, Citigroup (NYSE: C), which now trades at about $4 per share, has only about 38 percent ownership institutions).
“I think it's fair to say that the higher-priced stocks tend to have very high institutional ownership,” said Sundaresh Ramnath, associate professor of accounting at the University of Miami-School of Business Administration.
Of course, a company can reduce its per-share price by implementing a stock split – but Apple hasn't enacted a split in more than five years; and Google has never had one.
Perhaps the question should be – do companies with highly-priced shares have any incentive to keep the value so high as to prevent ownership by retail investors?
“There's no real upside to having a lot of retail stockholders,” Ramnath said.
“The downside of having too many retail owners is that you might introduce too much volatility, because with a lower-priced share many day-traders and short-term investors can enter the picture.”
Ramnath cites Warren Buffet, the owner of Berkshire-Hathaway.
“As a value-oriented, long-term investor, Buffet likes having investors who are in it for the long haul,” he noted.
“I think he made a conscious decision not to split [the stock] and let day traders in. His desire was to have stable long-term investors invest in the stock rather than speculators who only increase volatility.”
Those who can't afford the huge price tag on Berkshire-Hathaway's A shares, might opt for the B shares (NYSE: BRK.B), which currently trade at about $84 per share – but even that price is beyond the reach of most average investors.
Fred Fuld, president of Stockerblog.com, a financial/markets blog, takes a somewhat different view.