By Gerald Helguero: Subscribe to Gerald's RSS feed
November 17, 2010 6:04 PM EST
Full-body scanners and the alternative of invasive pat downs are needed to provide security for all air travelers, the top federal transportation security official said Wednesday.
Transportation Security Administrator John S. Pistole told a panel of Senators that he had personally received the "enhanced" pat down procedures authorized by his agency starting in October.
"It is thorough," he said. "It was more invasive than what I was used to."
Pistole, a 26-year veteran of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, said he was "very sensitive to people's privacy concerns" but added that it was necessary.
"Bottom line is we need to provide the best possible security," he said.
Follow us
The pat down procedures, which can involve touching on intimate areas of the body, are an option when air travelers opt out of full body imaging scanners installed at airports. Pat downs have recently come under greater attention by the public after recent incidents when some travelers refused the scan and pat down, ultimately being escorted from the airport and missing their flights.
Pistole said the normal procedure is that if an alarm is set off by the full body scanner, TSA officers may scan again or proceed to a pat down procedure. However in a "very small percentage" of cases, a pat down may be required randomly even if no alarm goes off, he said.
Pistole said he did not want to discuss the pat down procedure in detail at the open hearing due to security concerns.
"I don't want to give people a road map and how to defeat that," he said.
The decision to put in place more thorough pat downs was made after recent security scares including a 2009 Christmas Day incident where Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, an 18-year-old Nigerian, tried to detonate plastic explosives hidden in his underwear.
Pistole said another factor which contributed to the decision was that in various undercover tests, people were "were able to get through security largely because we were not being thorough enough in pat downs." His agency was also working with other nations to improve security practices.
Most Senators at the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science & Transportation hearing were supportive of the TSA's security policies. One, however, was unconvinced.
"I wouldn't want my wife to be touched that way," said George Lemieux R-FL.
"There are limits and there has to balance," Lemieux said. "I think we've gone too far afield."
Mark Zuckerberg's $6.4 Billion Loss: Value Of Facebook CEO's Stake A Gambler's Nightmare
Tasha Reign Says ‘Super Hot’ Bill Clinton Wanted To Meet Her and Brooklyn Lee, ‘Sympathetic’ For Viral Photo
Larry Flynt Blasts ‘Prudish And Delusional Right Wing’ Over S.E. Cupp Hustler Photo As ‘The View’ Hosts Jump To The Defense
Joe Biden Says He Understood Suicidal Thoughts In Wrenching Speech To Families Of Fallen Troops
US Cities with Most Underwater Mortgage [SLIDESHOW]We value your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.
