January 20, 2010 9:41 AM
NYTimes announces pay model for website
The following is the text of a press release put out this morning by the New York Times outlining a new model for its Web site that involves charging for articles:
The New York Times announced today that it will be introducing a paid model for NYTimes.com at the beginning of 2011.
The new approach, referred to as the metered model, will offer users free access to a set number of articles per month and then charge users once they exceed that number. This will enable NYTimes.com to create a second revenue stream and preserve its robust advertising business. It will also provide the necessary flexibility to keep an appropriate ratio between free and paid content and stay connected to a search-driven Web.
Through 2010, NYTimes.com will be building a new online infrastructure designed to provide consumers with a frictionless experience across multiple platforms. Once the metered model is implemented, New York Times home delivery print subscribers will continue to have free access to NYTimes.com.
"Our new business model is designed to provide additional support for The New York Times' extraordinary, professional journalism," said Arthur Sulzberger, Jr., chairman of The New York Times Company and publisher of The New York Times. "Our audiences are very loyal and we believe that our readers will pay for our award-winning digital content and services."
"This process of rethinking our business model has also been driven by our desire to achieve additional revenue diversity that will make us less susceptible to the inevitable economic cycles," said Janet L. Robinson, president and CEO, The New York Times Company. "We were also guided by the fact that our news and information are being featured in an increasingly broad range of end-user devices and services, and our pricing plans and policies must reflect this vision."
More details regarding the metered model will be available in the coming months.
James
there is a lot of news website out there, is this a good idea, i don't think so!
11:07 pm, Jan 23, 2010
Thom
Good idea, innit?
01:41 pm, Jan 21, 2010
John
if you charge things online, no one will read it.. unless it's extraordinary ..but i doubt any news will be that good..
04:46 pm, Jan 22, 2010
Andrew Davidson
Actually, it sounds like a good plan. The NY Times has really well written, non-biased articles that you can't find anywhere else. Worth a few bucks if you tend to rely on reputable news sources, vs. the internet horde. Sure, breaking news is common. Thought-provoking is rare.
12:04 am, Feb 8, 2010



