First, for all the complaining about CNBC (including from this voice) there are a handful of actual solid reporters there - they just don't happen to host (Mike Huckman in pharma, David Faber). Diane Olick does a fair and balanced job on the real estate beat - looking beyond the NAR's (always rosy) cheer while digging deeply into foreclosure data and the like rather than just presenting the mainstream spin. She has quite the story below. Once more, our financial oligarchs are at the center of the mess, running unchecked and skirting gray areas - not to mention skipping between black and white. I won't profess to be a real estate expert - or a short sale expert - but judging from the avalanche of comments on the CNBC website for this story, a lot of people have had this happen to them and various professionals in the business are speaking out against it. And when it comes to oligarchs, where there is smoke there is generally malfeasance.
Even He Who Walks on Water' aka your Next Treasury Secretary (as the revolving door between the banks and D.C. churns) has his banks hands all over this. Color me shocked. I mean what else do you expect when we've concentrated more and more power into fewer hands - right? [Sep 18, 2009: 3 Oligarchs Now Dominate Mortgage Market - All Backstopped by You] Whatever the antithesis of competition is... Cramerica style.
There is a 3 minute video attached (for email readers) if you prefer to not go through all the words - you can also follow the link to get a smattering of comments from people who are involved in this for a living. One must wonder what sort of regulators we have when something so apparently prevalent cannot be sniffed out by those who oversee the oligarchs.
p.s. the realtor who is willing to speak out on this (alleged) fraud is located in Phoenix, so if you are in the market and want to reward people with morals...
Just as regulators, lawmakers and all forms of financial oversight boards are talking about new regulations to guard against mortgage fraud and another mortgage meltdown, there appears to be yet a new mortgage fraud out there today, allegedly perpetuated by agents of, yes, the big banks
. I was first alerted to this by Jeremy Brandt, the CEO of several companies that bring short sale agents, investors and sellers together.
His companies include 1800CashOffer, HomeFlux.com and FastHomeOffer.com. Brandt has a huge network of short sale real estate agents, and over the past several months he's been receiving all kinds of questions and complaints about trouble with second lien holders
As we all know, during the housing boom, millions of Americans pulled cash out of their homes in the form of home equity loans and lines of credit. They also used piggy back loans in order to get even lower interest rates on their primary mortgages. Now, many of the borrowers in trouble, and many who are so far underwater on their loans that they don't qualify for any refi or modification, are choosing short sales as a way out. (Short sales are when the lender allows the home to be sold for less than the value of the loan
). About 12 percent of all home sales by the end of 2009 were short sales, according to the National Association of Realtors.
In order for a short sale with two loans to happen, the second lien holder has to drop the lien. If they don't, and there's no short sale, the home goes to foreclosure and the first lien holder gets the house because second liens are subordinated debt to the primary loan. In short, the second lien holder gets nothing
. In order to get the second lien holder to drop the lien, the first lien holder generally negotiates some partial payment to the second lien holder. The second lien holder doesn't have to agree, but more and more are doing so. That's all legal.
But here's what's not legal and what's apparently happening quite often recently. Since many second lien holders are getting very little, they are now allegedly requesting money on the side from either real estate agents or the buyers in the short sale. When I say on the side, I mean in cash, off the HUD settlement statements, so the first lien holder doesn't see it
They are pretty clear and pretty upfront about the fact that if the first lender knows they are getting paid, the first lender will kill the short sale,
says Brandt. So these second lenders are asking for the payments off the closing documents, off the HUD statement, usually in a cashiers check prior to closing
. Once they receive that payment, they will allow the short sale to go through, which according to RESPA laws and the lawyers that we have spoken to on the topic is not legal.
I told RESPA specialist Brian Sullivan over at HUD about all this and he replied, That's a red flag!
Brandt told me he's heard from at least 200 agents
that they've had these requests made by representatives of Citi Morgage (C), JP Morgan Chase (JPM), and Bank of America (BAC)
and other large banks.
Most agents wouldn't go on the record with me, for fear of retribution by the banks with whom they have to work every day.
But one agent, Kayte Gentry, of Keller Williams Integrity First Realty, was brave enough to blow the whistle.
I think it's wrong, and I think somebody needs to hold them accountable, and every time I lose a house in foreclosure because of this, it hurts my client, says Gentry matter-of-factly. Aside from being illegal and a violation of RESPA, it's immoral and truly it's just sad for the client that it's hurting.
Gentry says she has had the requests made three times and claims she lost one sale because of it.
The big banks that have recently made this request, specifically payments outside of the closing statement have been Citi Mortgage and JP Morgan Chase.
JP Morgan Chase
simply answered, No Comment,
when I relayed the charge to their media representative.
Bank of America
denied the practice to CNBC in a written statement:
Bank of America enforces a policy that all disbursements are documented on the settlement statement for short sales. When we are servicing a first mortgage with a second lien held by another investor, if the second lien holder asks for off-HUD payments, we will not approve the transaction (if we have knowledge of it). It is also against Bank of America’s policy to accept off-HUD payments on its second liens. Citi 's
reply was a bit more complicated
“We work very hard to help distressed homeowners find solutions for their financial challenges. In our attempt to amicably resolve the debt, we will generally negotiate a reduced settlement with the homeowner in order to release a second lien. Unlike some lenders who refuse to reduce the payoffs on second liens, we choose to reduce the payoff amounts in some situations to assist the borrower. We do not provide instructions to settlement agents on how to fill out the settlement statement or any other closing documents, and we certainly do not require settlement agents or any other parties to violate applicable laws. When we confront the lenders and tell them that this request is illegal and a violation of RESPA, they tell us it's been cleared through legal and they don't care. Do it anyway,
I personally heard a recording of a phone conversation between a short sale real estate agent and a second lien lender, during which the second lien lender clearly asked for cash outside of the settlement and threatened to kill the deal without it.
The real estate agent was rightly concerned and reluctant (the recording was given to me by Brandt who got it from the agent. The agent would provide no information on the lender, for fear of retribution
Well yes, I don’t want to lose my license, go to jail, I mean, I have to sign…
You're not going to lose your license - we have plenty of realtors who do this, who actually understand how this whole process goes - and they realize that OK, if I want to get this done, this will take place
I contacted the Treasury Department, HUD, FINCEN (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network) and the Federal Trade Commission, and none of their representatives could tell me of any active investigation into this. The folks at HUD said they'd be very interested to see my story.