Argentina's move to seize control of its biggest oil company, YPF, from Spain's Repsol
Indeed, investment managers and private bankers to the very rich are allocating more of their portfolios to developed markets, particularly the United States, as faith in its structural resilience outshines the appeal of developing countries.
If you are very thoughtful about it and don't want to get caught up in the headlines about the financial crisis dealing the U.S. a fatal blow, people are underestimating the resilience and structural diversity of the U.S. economy, said Sharmin Mossavar-Rahmani, Chief Investment Officer for Goldman Sachs' private wealth management business.
To many, the nationalisation of YPF is a reminder investment in countries such as Argentina, Brazil, India or China exposes money to higher political risk, a fact often ignored amid frustration at sluggish growth rates in the developed world.
While Argentina's economic nationalism reminded people of political risk, mishaps suffered by some star investors who dabbled with the exotic have also left them reflecting on higher governance risk in such markets.
Fidelity's veteran British fund manager Anthony Bolton has disappointed investors with poor performances since he started running a China fund in 2010, and has flagged corporate governance in the region as a particular challenge.
We like emerging markets but we're not euphoric about emerging markets, said Mossavar-Rahmani.
This view contrasts with a widely held position that gained traction after the financial crisis, that the developed world is entering a long decline and the best prospects are to be found in fast-growing emerging markets, particularly in Asia.
In our view, the global financial markets crisis of 2008-2009 was a watershed event and we are moving towards a new world order, said HSBC Global Asset Management in an investment report on Thursday.
But while investors are reporting signs that more money is starting to move to developed markets, the trend is already in evidence in the manufacturing sector.
Capital goes where it's best treated, said James Abate, manager of PSigma's American fund and managing director of New York-based Centre Asset Management.
Big companies including Boeing
We, lemming-like, over the last 15 years extended our supply chains a little too far globally in the name of low cost, said Jim McNerney, chief executive of world No. 2 planemaker Boeing, at a forum in Washington this year.
We lost control in some cases over quality and service when we did that. We underestimated in some cases the value of our workers back here.
Arguments that structural features of the U.S. economy give it a secular advantage over emerging rivals will resonate with academics, many of whom have questioned assumptions by economists in financial services about the rise of China.
Economists such as Daron Acemoglu at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology argue authoritarian countries are less effective than open societies such as the U.S. at incentivising entrepreneurship and innovation.
A population incentivised to innovate and invest, results in more sustainable long-term economic growth than can be achieved in unequal societies like China, the argument goes.
More investors are now pointing to the success of companies such as Apple
The high levels of innovation that exist here in the U.S. are quite hard to replicate in other parts of the world, and I think innovation is important and people do tend to forget about it, said Joanna Shatney, a portfolio manager of U.S. equities at Schroders
If you're looking for the 'Steady Eddy' tortoise that might win the race ... we've got real ways to grow our economy.
(Reporting by Chris Vellacott, editing by Sinead Cruise and David Hulmes)