Log in to your IBTimes Account

close
ID
Password
  • Set your IBTimes.com Edition

Cap-and-trade bill economic benefits disputed in Senate



16 July 2009 @ 06:18 pm ET

A major new energy bill won’t spur economic development and create new jobs, Republican Senators said Thursday during a public hearing.

Related Topic

Get stories by e-mail on this topic.

  • climate policy | RSS
  • energy policy | RSS
E-mail:

The American Clean Energy and Security Act was being discussed by the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public works.

Republicans on the Senate committee expressed their fear that the so-called climate bill will "kill" U.S. jobs and relocate them overseas while imposing higher energy prices for consumers. Republicans estimate there would be a net jobs reduction of 2.3 million to 2.7 million if the bill is enacted, Senator James Inhofe noted.

In addition, Senate Republican members questioned why an unemployment insurance program, or federal assistance to relocate people who lose their jobs is included in the legislation.

"If the bill actually creates jobs then there will be no need for any of these, a section on unemployment benefits, job relocation and all the rest of that," Oklahoma Senator Inhofe said during his opening comments at the hearings today.

The U.S. House of Representatives barely passed the climate bill June. The legislation is also referred to as the cap-and-trade bill or Waxman-Markey bill. Its goal is to cut carbon emissions 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020 through increasing clean energy generation and putting limits on emissions of greenhouse gases from power plants, refineries and factories.

Democrats, on the other hand, sustained the bill will create clean energy jobs.

"When we unleash the American innovative spirit, we will drive economic growth and create jobs and create whole new industries here at home. American entrepreneurs will create jobs," Chairman Barbara Boxer said.

Boxer also said the Senate will do "more than protect consumers."

"You are going to hear some widely different views on how much is going to cost consumers," Boxer told the panel. "But we have the modeling and we know what it is, we know what the Waxman-Markey bill shows," Boxer added.

A guest panel included Harry Alford, President and CEO of the National Black Chamber of Commerce, Julian Wong, Senior Policy Analyst at the Center for American Progress Action Fund, John Krenicki, Vice Chairman for General Electric, and John Doerr, Partner at Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers.

This article is copyrighted by International Business Times.

    Click!
  • Rate this article:

Comments
1.
Jul 16, 2009 10:30pm

The Waxman-Markey Bill is simple to understand: 1) Global Warming is not driven by man made greenhouse gases, 2) so there is no need to limit or tax companies and individuals 'cap and trade' it, If you believe as me, stop EXISTING CLIMATE Laws RGGI and CARB (as well as proposed Waxman-Markey Bill) by signing the petition at www.CO2isOK.org/petition.html Thanks for your time.
2.
Jul 17, 2009 1:50pm

Rather than a complex carbon trading system that would produce volatile energy prices like the one outlined in Waxman-Markey, a growing number of leading scientists and economists now support a straightforward carbon tax — a policy that’s simple, transparent, and easy to administer. Moreover, the revenues from this approach can be recycled in tax relief for American families, protecting them and the overall economy. Especially in these uncertain times, I implore the Senate to look at a revenue-neutral carbon tax as an alternative to cap and trade.
3.
Jul 17, 2009 5:17pm

We must control carbon emissions to preserve a viable world for our kids and grandkids. And we can do so while growing our economy, at minimal cost, while creating whole new industries. It's a non-brainer. The Senate should quickly pass a bill very close to what the House passed.
4.
Jul 17, 2009 10:46pm

The house version of the Cap and Trade bill will devastate the US economy. It will increase unemployment, taxes, electric rates and in doing so put us in more of a economic downturn causing more foreclosures. This bill will cause companies to move out of the US. Simply put it will cause a economic tailspin. Let us hope the Senate is smarter than the House and defeats this horrible bill.
5.
Sep 9, 2009 12:26pm

While most people don't have a coal company job. My husband does. He is not a mine worker ,but an accountant and this new bill is hitting home to us. I remember waking up this morning and hearing my husband praying about being able to have a job in the future. If this bill passes we might not and I have never been so scared about what the senate is going to do !

Post Your Comment

*Name

  • International Business Times Secutiry Check

advertisement
More Energy
U.S.-listed solar shares sank on Monday, cutting into gains earlier this month as investors feared Germany's new coalition government could trim support ...
Exelon Corp, the largest nuclear power operator in the United States, on Monday became the latest U.S. power company to say it will leave the Chamber of ...

advertisement
 
IBTimes.com Web
Partners
International Business Times© Copyright 2010 Intertnational Business Times. Terms of service | Privacy Policy | Advertising | About Us | Contact Us | Archives