By Hao Li: Subscribe to Hao's RSS feed
February 23, 2011 12:29 PM EST
US “austerity is really foolish,” said famed economist and Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz in his office at Columbia University, in an interview with IBTimes.
Stiglitz, author of Freefall: America, Free Markets, and the Sinking of the World Economy, is a leading authority on the causes of the global financial crisis.
In the aftermath of the meltdown and the budget deficit problem that has been exacerbated by government fiscal stimulus, he thinks austerity, or cutting the size of government spending, is the wrong remedy for the US – especially if one cuts funding in all the wrong places.
Instead, he thinks America should tackle the budget deficit issue from the tax revenues side.
“What matters is debt relative to GDP. If we spend on investment, the economy goes up, tax revenues go up, and everything is better,” said Stiglitz.
Follow us
Conversely, if America cuts back spending, the economy would grow slower, the unemployment rate would remain high, and the budget deficit would become less sustainable. About 10 years ago, Argentina went down this erroneous path of austerity and ended up defaulting on its sovereign debt, said Stiglitz.
Moreover, investment spending makes sense because America (unlike countries like Japan) is underinvested. Stiglitz said it is underinvested in technology, infrastructure, and particularly in education/research.
He said some of the most important technological advances in the US have come from government/university research. Biotechnology and the internet are examples. These advances, of course, created new industries (and jobs), improved productivity in existing industries, and provided huge boosts to the overall wealth and growth of the United States.
Even though universities in other countries are catching up, US universities are still “way above at the top.” The US government has also shown itself quite capable of advancing research when it comes to military technology, so it’s reasonable to assume it can do likewise in other areas as well.
Given these proven capabilities, investment in education and research is largely an issue of more funding, said Stiglitz.
In this regard, China may be a good example for the US to follow.
First, Chinese government funding for research is focused on commercial technology.
“They have an active government industrial policy. We (the US) have an industrial policy, but [it is] mostly buried in the military. While we have been developing smart bombs, they have been developing green technology,” said Stiglitz.
Second, the Chinese are spending more on education while the US is cutting back.
Jenna Talackova, Transgender Beauty Queen, Falls Short in 2012 Miss Universe Canada Pageant [PHOTOS, VIDEO]
McDonald's Vandalized by Dissatisfied Cheeseburger Customers
Who is Priscilla Chan, Mark Zuckerberg’s Wife?
Lauren Odes, NJ Woman, Fired From Lingerie Store For Being Too Busty [PHOTOS]
Will Smith Slaps Reporter Vitalii Sediuk For Kiss At ‘Men In Black III’ Moscow Premiere [VIDEO]We value your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.
