Herman Cain said on Sunday that he opposed abortion under all circumstances, including in cases of rape, incest or to save the mother's life.
This position puts Cain to the right of even most anti-abortion/pro-life activists, who often oppose exceptions for rape or incest but almost invariably support an exception if a woman's life is in danger.
It is also the latest in a string of contradictory positions he has taken on abortion, which raises the question of whether he actually believes abortion should be illegal without exceptions or whether he just thinks that's what voters want to hear.
In 1998, Cain, then CEO of the National Restaurant Association, told Nation's Restaurant News that he had decided not to run for the U.S. Senate in 2000 because he thought his moderate views on abortion would alienate conservatives. "Too many people in the electorate are single-issue voters, and to try and cater to the single-issue voters and the single-issue pockets out there felt like I was compromising my beliefs," he said. "As an example, with the pro-life and pro-abortion debate, the most vocal people are on the ends. I am pro-life with exceptions, and people want you to be all or nothing."
On July 14, 2011, Cain had a surreally confusing exchange -- you can watch the video here -- with John Stossel of Fox Business News (emphasis added):
Follow us
CAIN: I'm pro-life from conception, yes.
STOSSEL: Any cases where it should be legal?
CAIN: I don't think government should make that decision.
STOSSEL: People should be free to abort a baby?
CAIN: I support life from conception. No, people shouldn't just be free to abort because if we don't protect the sanctity of life from conception, we will also start to play God relative to life at the end of life.
STOSSEL: So I'm confused on what your position is.
CAIN: My position is I'm pro-life, period.
STOSSEL: If a woman is raped, she should not be allowed to end the pregnancy?
CAIN: That's her choice. That is not government's choice. I support life from conception.