Sponsorship Link
The Department of Justice was reprimanded today by the U.S. Congress for suggesting the necessity of the Internet Data Retention legislation, which if passed would require Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to preserve records of user activity longer, but failing to provide more details on how it could aid in criminal investigations.
/
At a House of Representatives hearing on Tuesday, the Justice Department suggested that a law be passed that would force ISPs to collect and store data about their customers that they would not normally retain.
"The gap between providers retention practices and the needs of law enforcement can be extremely harmful to investigations that are critical to protecting the public from predators," Jason Weinstein, deputy assistant attorney general for the criminal division, said.
Internet records, he said, are often "the only available evidence that allows us to investigate who committed crimes on the Internet."
Must Read
However, "The lack of adequate, uniform and consistent data retention policies threatens our ability to use the legal tools Congress has provided to law enforcement to protect public safety," he added.
Follow us
The House Justice Committee was sympathetic to the appeal but chided Weinstein for admitting that the "government doesn't have a specific proposal" at the moment.
While John Conyers, the senior Democrat on the House Judiciary committee wondered "how many years is this going to take," Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) said she was disappointed that the Justice Department doesn't "have a specific proposal" right now.
However, Schultz acknowledged that the legislation could help "connect the dots" in criminal investigations.
According to Weinstein, the Justice Department is not interested in forcing ISPs retain "content information" such as the text of e-mail, text, or SMS messages. The ISPs would, however, be expected to track and retain data of the websites visited by every Internet user.
As for the duration of retention, Weinstein said two years in a "useful starting point" so as not to conflict with the statute of limitations.
Weinstein, however, did not say whether information stored in social network sites or image uploading sites would come within the ambit of the new legislation.
Currently, ISPs discard of log files that's not required for business reasons such as network monitoring, fraud prevention, or billing disputes. The general rule is, however, altered when the ISPs are contacted by police performing a criminal investigation.
The data retention bill is not expected to face much opposition as many lawmakers feel the Internet has become a virtual playground for sex predators and pedophiles.
"When law enforcement officers do develop leads that might ultimately result in saving a child or apprehending a pornographer, their efforts should not be frustrated because vital records were destroyed simply because there was no requirement to retain them. Every piece of discarded information could be the footprint of a child predator," said Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas).
