As energy firm TransCanada Corp. (USA) (NYSE:TRP) approaches completion of the southern portion of the controversial Keystone XL pipeline, consumer advocacy group Public Citizen is raising questions about the “integrity of the pipeline.”
The group released a report last month arguing that numerous construction problems and apparent code violations could increase chances of a spill on the southern leg, dubbed the Gulf Coast pipeline.
Unlike the southern leg, the northern segment crosses the U.S.-Canadian border and therefore needs a presidential permit. The energy giant is currently awaiting an answer from President Barack Obama, which has so far designated the State Department to review whether the pipeline is in the U.S. national interest.
The group identified at least 125 imperfections in a span of 250-miles, inclduing dents, bad welds, improper backfilling, unintentional sags, insufficient pipe support and poor soil management.
The $2.3 billion pipeline would carry more than 700,000 barrels of oil a day from the oil hub at Cushing, Okla. south to Texas Gulf Coast refineries. The project has been under construction since August 2012.
In response to the report, TransCanada told International Business Times that the “Gulf Coast Pipeline will be the safest pipeline built in the United States to date.”
Shawn Howard, spokesman for the energy company, said in a statement that all pipelines are tested to ensure that there are no leaks.
“The pipe is hydrostatically tested in a mill and then again in the field after it is welded together. We conduct external and in-line inspections and pressure the pipe up using water to levels far higher than the operating pressures of the pipeline,” Howard said. “The fact that we have conducted investigative digs after our inspections revealed dents that occurred during construction is a sign that our inspection programs work.”
Howard was responding to pictures suggesting that pipelines in the field are unsafe and faulty.
Until recent years U.S. crude stored in Cushing was shipped north and east, but as more oil was produced in the Upper Midwest and in Canada, refineries in the eastern and northern U.S., as well as in Canada, have not been able to keep up with the glut.
Currently the Canadian company is seeking U.S. approval to start construction of the northern half of the Keystone XL project, which would bring tar sands oil from Alberta to U.S. Gulf Coast refineries. It is up to President Barack Obama to give the approval because the pipeline crosses the U.S. border. So far Obama has delegated the State Department to determine whether the project is in the U.S.'s "national interest."
Opponents say extracting crude oil from Alberta is extremely energy-intensive and will accelerate climate change, because it requires breaking down a semi-solid form of petroleum, called tar-sands, so it can flow through a pipeline, something that is not necessary for normal crude oil.
Proponents, on the other hand, say the benefits of the pipeline outweigh the environmental risks because it will reduce America's dependence on oil from hostile, unstable countries in the Middle East and elsewhere.
Environmentalists have been fighting the entire project, but one reason the Gulf Coast pipeline has gained less attention than the northern part is that it does not cross an international border. That does not mean environmentalists have not been fighting the project’s southern leg.
“As we have said before, there is a big difference between not doing something safely versus someone suggesting it be done differently,” Howard said. “We will not compromise on doing things safely – period.”
David is a New York native and holds a MS from Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism. He received his BA in government diplomacy, majoring in...