Did Kelly Clarkson Send A Message To Her Ex By Singing This Billie Eilish Song?

Kelly Clarkson sang Billie Eilish's "Happier Than Ever," but she slightly changed the lyrics, causing her fans to speculate that she was sending a message to her ex-husband, Brandon Blackstock.

Clarkson recently wowed the audience of "The Kelly Clarkson Show" during the "Kellyoke" segment. Last week, she sang an abridged version of Eilish's breakup single "Happier Than ever." She kept the expletives in the song but changed the lyrics a bit, Entertainment Tonight reported.

"I don't relate to you / I don't relate to you, no / 'Cause I'd never treat me this sh-tty / You made me hate this city," Eilish sings in the original song.

When Clarkson sang the single, she opted for the expletives to be bleeped out. She also changed the last line from "You made me hate this city" to "I get it, you hate this city."

"You ruined everything good / Always said you were misunderstood / Made all my moments your own / Just f--king leave me alone," she ended her performance.

Clarkson is based in Los Angeles where she primarily lives and works. Meanwhile, her ex is currently living in Montana where he has been working full time as a rancher.

Blackstock and Clarkson have been fighting over the Montana ranch where he is staying. The talent manager said that he wasn't expanding his client list and music management business because he wanted to work on the ranch full time.

However, the property that the exes have been fighting over has just been awarded to the "Stronger" singer. According to the court order obtained by E! News last week, the court rejected Blackstock's claim that the estate is marital property and should be shared equally because their prenuptial agreement was valid. Since Clarkson was the one who purchased the property, it should belong to her.

"The Court further finds that the Montana Ranch and the other two Montana properties are not titled in both of the Parties' names either as joint tenants with right of survivorship or as tenants by the entireties, as required under the PMA to create marital property," the new decision read. "The Court, therefore, rejects Respondent's position that the Montana Ranch and other Montana properties are marital property owned 50/50 by the Parties."

Clarkson wanted to sell the Montana ranch because she considers it a "financial burden" as the maintenance costs run up to $81,000 a month. Her initial request to sell it was denied because Blackstock is living in the property, but she can now push through with her plans for the estate after the court's recent ruling.