Google
Google IBTimes US

Google has revealed new details about its in-development blockchain, the Google Cloud Universal Ledger (GCUL). In a LinkedIn post, Rich Widmann, Google's head of Web3 strategy, described the project as the result of "years of R&D," designed to provide a neutral infrastructure layer for global finance with support for Python-based smart contracts.

"Any financial institution can build with GCUL," Widmann said, positioning the network as a shared layer rather than one tied to a competitor's ecosystem.

What's Up With Google Building a "Planet-Scale" Blockchain?

The blockchain wars among fintech giants are heating up. Stripe is building Tempo, a payments-centric chain tied to its $1.4 trillion processing rails, while Circle has launched Arc, designed around its USDC stablecoin.

Google's pitch is different: rather than locking adoption to a single corporate ecosystem, GCUL is meant to be shared plumbing—much like Ethereum or Polkadot—and a ledger financial institutions can adopt without being tied to a competitor's core business.

According to Widmann's post, GCUL aims to be "planet-scale," supporting billions of users and bank-grade functionality.

  • Stripe's Tempo: focused on merchant flows.
  • Circle's Arc: stablecoin-native chain with FX and settlement tools.
  • Google's GCUL: open infrastructure with Python smart contracts and institutional-grade tokenization.

If Google is able to capture even a portion of Web3, that's $4Tn market that they can play with. Maybe it's time to load up on Alphabet stock?

Here's What Comes Next for GCUL

Stablecoins remain above $200 billion, underscoring the demand for trusted settlement rails. Layer-1 DeFi activity has grown 35% YoY, even amid broader market volatility. If GCUL can position itself as a neutral base for these flows, it could capture a meaningful share of tokenization and settlement volumes.

Google plans to release technical details "in the coming months" as it works toward a full-scale rollout with CME and other partners.

The big question is whether institutions will embrace Google's claim of neutrality or if reliance on a tech giant will simply replace one form of centralization with another.

Google