The United States Federal Communications Commission voted Thursday on party lines to approve the Restoring Internet Freedom Order—a move that will act to undo net neutrality protections set in place by the previous administration.

The order, proposed by commission Chairman and Donald Trump appointee Ajit Pai, will enter the process of finalizing the rule before it take effect. It will be at least sixty days before the final order is published and will take affect.

Following Thursday’s vote, the commission will begin making final edits to the text of the order. Once completed, the FCC must submit the order to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), which will review the order.

A copy must also be provided to the U.S. Congress and Government Accountability Office (GAO) and can be reviewed under the Congressional Review Act. Once OMB grants its approval for the order, the agency publishes the text in the Federal Register. The order begins to take effect 60 days after its publication.

Even then, net neutrality itself will not be gone. Net neutrality is an idea that all data must be treated equal. It consists of three rules that prohibit internet service providers from blocking content, slowing or throttling connections and offering favorable service to those who pay more.

Under the Open Internet Order, passed in 2015, the FCC was given the regulatory power to enforce those rules by reclassifying internet service providers as common carriers. The concept of net neutrality will continue to exist after the Restoring Internet Freedom Act but the FCC’s ability to enforce it will be gone as soon as the Order is made official, as the new rule undoes the ISP classification.

The process leaves a brief period of time for which others can challenge the decision, and it appears there will be a number of government officials lining up to do just that.

New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman announced after Thursday’s vote that he intends to bring the first legal challenge against the FCC’s Restoring Internet Freedom Order. Schneiderman has been investigating the legitimacy of comments left during the FCC’s public commenting period for the order and has reported to have found comments that have falsely used the personal information of people who did not post them.

https://twitter.com/AGSchneiderman/status/941390196314181632

Schneiderman will lead a multi-state legal challenge to the FCC in order to “stop the FCC’s illegal rollback of net neutrality.” The lawsuit is expected to be filed within the next few days.

“We will be filing a claim to preserve protections for New Yorkers and all Americans. And we’ll be working aggressively to stop the FCC’s leadership from doing any further damage to the internet and to our economy,” Schneiderman said in a press release.

https://twitter.com/AGSchneiderman/status/941370862976012288

“Today’s new rule would enable ISPs to charge consumers more to access sites like Facebook and Twitter and give them the leverage to degrade high quality of video streaming until and unless somebody pays them more money. Even worse, today’s vote would enable ISPs to favor certain viewpoints over others.”

Schneiderman is not the only attorney general who is eyeing the FCC’s actions. Earlier this week, 18 attorney general signed onto a letter urging the FCC to delay the vote on the Restoring Internet Freedom Order. The states included California, Delaware, Hawaii, Kentucky, Iowa, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, Mississippi, Oregon, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Rhode Island, Washington, Vermont, Virginia and the District of Columbia.

Senator Edward Markey, D-Ma., announced that he would put forward a Congressional Review Act resolution that would “restore the Open Internet Order and reverse the FCC’s historic mistake of repealing net neutrality.” He was joined by 17 co-sponsors, 16 of which are Democrats. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., was the only co-sponsor not registered as a Democrat.