Xi TRUMP
Administration officials have reportedly explored multiple strategies that would make it more difficult for U.S. companies to use Chinese AI technology without necessarily imposing an outright ban. (Brendan SMIALOWSKI / AFP via Getty Images/Getty Images

The Trump administration is once again weighing measures that could sharply limit U.S. access to advanced Chinese artificial intelligence models in the increasingly intense AI race with Beijing, according to a new report.

The discussions come as Chinese AI developers continue to close the performance gap with leading American companies while offering significantly cheaper models that are increasingly attractive to businesses. The latest catalyst is the rapid emergence of Moonshot AI's Kimi model, which has fueled renewed concern inside Washington over China's growing influence in the global AI race.

According to Axios, administration officials have explored multiple strategies that would make it more difficult for U.S. companies to use Chinese AI technology without necessarily imposing an outright ban.

Instead, officials are reportedly considering a combination of regulatory pressure, procurement restrictions and cybersecurity warnings that could discourage adoption of Chinese models while avoiding sweeping prohibitions.

The outlet detailed that the Commerce Department last year examined placing several Chinese AI laboratories on its Entity List, a move that would effectively block American access to their technology without a government license.

Sources familiar with the discussions also said the National Security Agency and the White House Office of the National Cyber Director considered issuing advisories warning businesses about potential risks associated with Chinese AI models.

Another proposal reportedly involved an executive order requiring U.S. companies hosting Chinese AI models to guarantee their security and assume liability if those systems were later compromised.

Commerce officials also reportedly circulated draft rules that would use supply chain security authorities to target Chinese open source AI models. Those initiatives ultimately failed to move forward after officials worried about the impact on innovation pushed back against additional regulation.

However, Axios reported that the balance inside the administration has shifted. Several officials who opposed stricter controls have departed, while national security advocates have gained influence amid rising concerns over cybersecurity and China's accelerating AI capabilities.

Rather than implementing a formal prohibition, officials are now said to favor a strategy that gradually discourages the use of Chinese AI through procurement policies, Entity List threats and public campaigns highlighting potential security vulnerabilities.

One source familiar with the discussions told Axios that the effort is designed to be "slower and more durable" than an outright ban, creating long-term incentives for companies to choose American alternatives instead.

Another source described an approach focused on raising awareness about potential cybersecurity risks associated with Chinese models while simultaneously encouraging growth in the domestic open source AI ecosystem.

Still, the strategy faces a practical challenge. Chinese open source models have become increasingly competitive with their American counterparts while often costing substantially less to deploy, making them attractive for developers and enterprises seeking affordable AI solutions.

Critics worry that limiting access to those models could reduce competition and strengthen the market position of America's largest AI companies, particularly OpenAI and Anthropic.
David Sacks, an outside White House AI adviser and longtime advocate for open source AI, publicly criticized what he views as efforts to use government policy to protect dominant AI developers.

"We are at a critical inflection point in AI policy," Sacks wrote Sunday on X. "The leading closed labs, already a duopoly in terms of AI model revenue, want the government to eliminate their open-source competition."

Sacks has consistently argued that excessive regulation could create barriers benefiting only the largest AI firms while limiting innovation across the broader technology sector.
According to Axios, sources familiar with the administration's deliberations said major AI companies or their allies have repeatedly presented proposals aimed at restricting open-source models every few months, although those efforts have not previously resulted in formal policy changes.